Question: (Last edited: Friday, 31 July 2020, 6:50 PM)Emergency research | ||
---|---|---|
Answer: in human subjects research, research that is conducted when a subject who cannot provide informed consent faces a life-threatening illness that requires immediate treatment and has no available legally authorized representative to provide consent. The Food and Drug Administration has developed special rules for emergency research involving products that it regulates. | ||
Question: (Last edited: Friday, 31 July 2020, 6:50 PM)Error | ||
---|---|---|
Answer: an unintended adverse outcome; a mistake. | ||
Question: (Last edited: Friday, 31 July 2020, 6:50 PM)Ethical dilemma | ||
---|---|---|
Answer: A situation in which two or more potential actions appear to be equally justifiable from an ethical point of view, i.e. one must choose between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods. | ||
Question: (Last edited: Friday, 31 July 2020, 6:51 PM)Ethical reasoning | ||
---|---|---|
Answer: Making a decision in response to a moral dilemma based a careful and thorough assessment of the different options in light of the facts and circumstances and ethical considerations. | ||
Question: (Last edited: Friday, 31 July 2020, 6:51 PM)Ethical relativism | ||
---|---|---|
Answer: The view that ethical standards are relative to a particular culture, society, historical period, etc. When in Rome, do as the Romans do. See Ethical universalism. | ||
Question: (Last edited: Friday, 31 July 2020, 6:52 PM)Ethical theory | ||
---|---|---|
Answer: A set of statements that attempts to unify, systematize, and explain our moral experience, i.e. our intuitions or judgments about right/wrong, good/bad, etc. See Kantianism, Utilitarianism, Virtue ethics. | ||
Question: (Last edited: Friday, 31 July 2020, 6:53 PM)Ethical universalism | ||
---|---|---|
Answer: The view that the same standards of ethics apply to all people at all times. | ||
Question: (Last edited: Friday, 31 July 2020, 6:53 PM)Ethics (or morals) | ||
---|---|---|
Answer: 1. Standards of conduct (or behavior) that distinguish between right/wrong, good/bad, etc. 2. The study of standards of conduct. | ||
Question: (Last edited: Friday, 31 July 2020, 6:54 PM)Ethics, applied | ||
---|---|---|
Answer: The study of ethics in specific situations, professions, or institutions, e.g. medical ethics, research ethics, etc. | ||
Question: (Last edited: Friday, 31 July 2020, 6:54 PM)Ethics, meta- | ||
---|---|---|
Answer: The study of the meaning, truth, and justification of ethical statements. | ||
Question: (Last edited: Friday, 31 July 2020, 6:55 PM)Ethics, normative vs. descriptive | ||
---|---|---|
Answer: Normative ethics studies the standards of conduct and methods of reasoning that people ought to follow. Descriptive ethics studies the standards of conduct and reasoning processes that people in fact follow. Normative ethics seeks to prescribe and evaluate conduct, whereas descriptive ethics seeks to describe and explain conduct. Disciplines such as philosophy and religious studies take a normative approach to ethics, whereas sociology, anthropology, psychology, neuroscience, and evolutionary biology take a descriptive approach. | ||
Question: (Last edited: Friday, 31 July 2020, 6:56 PM)Exculpatory language | ||
---|---|---|
Answer: language in an informed consent form, contract, or other document intended to excuse a party from legal liability. | ||
Question: (Last edited: Friday, 31 July 2020, 6:55 PM)Exempt research | ||
---|---|---|
Answer: human subjects research which is exempted from review by an institutional review board. Some types of exempt research include research on existing human samples or data in which the researcher cannot readily identify individuals and anonymous surveys of individuals. | ||
Question: (Last edited: Friday, 31 July 2020, 6:56 PM)Expedited review | ||
---|---|---|
Answer: in human subjects research, review of a study by the chair of an institutional review board (or designee) instead of by the full board. Expedited review may be conducted on new studies that pose minimal risks to subjects, for continuing review in which a study is no longer recruiting subjects, or on amendments to approved studies that make only minor changes. | ||
Question: (Last edited: Friday, 31 July 2020, 6:57 PM)Exploitation | ||
---|---|---|
Answer: taking unfair advantage of someone else. | ||
Question: (Last edited: Friday, 31 July 2020, 6:57 PM)Expression of concern | ||
---|---|---|
Answer: a journal may publish an expression of concern when a paper has come under suspicion for wrongdoing or is being investigated for possible research misconduct. | ||